Sturdivant v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sturdivant v. State

124 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 679

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sturdivant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 148 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 1929·No. 1 Div. 898.·Published

Opinion

BRICIÍEN, P. J.

Tbe indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant at tbe January, 1929, term of Mobile circuit court, charged him with tbe offense of crime against nature. Code 1923, § 3862.

He was tried and convicted as charged, and duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in tbe penitentiary. Erom the judgment of conviction be appealed, and rests bis appeal here upon tbe record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions.

There is no error in tbe record. Tbe judgment of conviction in the lower court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICIÍEN, P. J.

Tbe indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant at tbe January, 1929, term of Mobile circuit court, charged him with tbe offense of crime against nature. Code 1923, § 3862.

He was tried and convicted as charged, and duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in tbe penitentiary. Erom the judgment of conviction be appealed, and rests bis appeal here upon tbe record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions.

There is no error in tbe record. Tbe judgment of conviction in the lower court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Sturdivant v. State, 124 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

124 So. 926 (Sturdivant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.