Sturdivant v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sturdivant v. State

124 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 679

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 26, 1929

Docket1 Div. 898.

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 926 (Sturdivant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sturdivant v. State, 124 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICIÍEN, P. J.

Tbe indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant at tbe January, 1929, term of Mobile circuit court, charged him with tbe offense of crime against nature. Code 1923, § 3862.

He was tried and convicted as charged, and duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in tbe penitentiary. Erom the judgment of conviction be appealed, and rests bis appeal here upon tbe record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions.

There is no error in tbe record. Tbe judgment of conviction in the lower court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICIÍEN, P. J.

Tbe indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant at tbe January, 1929, term of Mobile circuit court, charged him with tbe offense of crime against nature. Code 1923, § 3862.

He was tried and convicted as charged, and duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in tbe penitentiary. Erom the judgment of conviction be appealed, and rests bis appeal here upon tbe record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions.

There is no error in tbe record. Tbe judgment of conviction in the lower court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturdivant-v-state-alactapp-1929.