Sturdivant v. Memphis Nat. Bank

60 F. 736, 9 C.C.A. 261, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 1894
DocketNo. 171
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. 736 (Sturdivant v. Memphis Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturdivant v. Memphis Nat. Bank, 60 F. 736, 9 C.C.A. 261, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137 (5th Cir. 1894).

Opinion

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This case is, in all respects, identical with the case of Sturdivant v. Bank (No. 170; just decided), GO Fed. 730, and is to be ruled the same way. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case remanded, with instructions to reinstate the fourth plea, award a new trial, and otherwise proceed according to the views announced by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F. 736, 9 C.C.A. 261, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturdivant-v-memphis-nat-bank-ca5-1894.