Sturdivant v. McHugh

450 F. App'x 235
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2010·No. No. 09-2376·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sturdivant v. Geren, No. 1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA, 2009 WL 4030738 (E.D. Va., filed Nov. 19, 2009 & entered Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sturdivant v. McHugh, 450 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2010).

450 F. App'x 235 (Sturdivant v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
W.D. Virginia, 2026
Wood v. NC Dept. of Justice
E.D. North Carolina, 2025