Sturdivant v. McHugh
This text of Sturdivant v. McHugh (Sturdivant v. McHugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2376
NATHAN STURDIVANT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN MCHUGH, Honorable, Department of the Army; SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA)
Submitted: July 26, 2010 Decided: August 16, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nathan Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sturdivant v. McHugh, No. 1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA (E.D.
Va., filed Nov. 19, 2009 & entered Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sturdivant v. McHugh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturdivant-v-mchugh-ca4-2010.