Sturckler v. Lux
This text of 233 A.D. 799 (Sturckler v. Lux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed in part and motion granted so far as it relates to the subjects of examination specified in paragraphs numbered 2 and 3 in the notice, except that plaintiff’s examination shall include the subject of the ownership of the automobile at the time of the accident and any agreement or arrangements between the defendant Lux and the defendant corporation during the time of the employment of John Lux, respecting any permission granted by defendant corporation to Lux relating to the driving of the car; and otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturckler-v-lux-nyappdiv-1931.