Stupeck v. Union Pac. R.
This text of 200 F. 192 (Stupeck v. Union Pac. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A number of reasons for sustaining the demurrer have been urged upon the argument herein. The court finds it unnecessary to pass on all of these.
This is an action under Rev. St. Colo. 1908, §§ 5513, 5514, to recover a penalty of $8,000 for failure to settle a claim against defendant, 'held by plaintiff; the penalty being for 80 months at the rate of $100 per month, as provided by the statute just mentioned. The original claim as presented to the railroad company is variously stated in the complaint as being $1,412.50, $1,682.80, and $1,792.72. In any event, however, the claim considerably exceeded the amount finally recovered, which was $1,211.60. It was stated on the argument' that some $800 of this last was principal, and the remainder interest, while'the cause was in court. Under any aspect, therefore, the demand made upon the defendant was greatly in excess of the amount which the judgment of the court declared to be its legal liability. The effect of the statute, if given the construction contended for by plaintiff, is thus to penalize the defense of the company against what the result shows to have been an excessive claim, and is therefore repugnant to the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. The case is thus controlled by St. Louis, etc., Railroad Co. v. Wynne, 224 U. S. 354, 32 Sup. Ct. 493, 56 L. Ed. 799, decided April 15, 1912.
The case of Seaboard, etc., Railway Co. v. Seegers, 207 U. S. 73, 28 Sup. Ct. 28, 52 L. Ed. 108, is relied upon by the plaintiff. That was a case, however, in which the entire original claim seems to have been recovered. It is noted and distinguished in the Wynne Case.
The demurrer will be sustained, and the petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 F. 192, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stupeck-v-union-pac-r-cod-1912.