Stupar v. State

102 So. 3d 667, 2012 WL 1110625, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-4706
StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 3d 667 (Stupar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stupar v. State, 102 So. 3d 667, 2012 WL 1110625, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely because it was not filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be appealed. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.110(b). In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s “Motion to Hear and Rule,” filed in this Court on February 27, 2012, is hereby denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 So. 3d 667, 2012 WL 1110625, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stupar-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.