Stumpf v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stumpf v. State

128 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 733

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 14, 1912

DocketNo. A-1344.

StatusPublished

This text of 128 P. 1135 (Stumpf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stumpf v. State, 128 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 733 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Julius Stumpf, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on an- information which charged that he did commit the crime of selling intoxicating liquor. May 23, 1911, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of six months and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. Prom the. judgment the defendant appealed. We have carefully examined the record and find no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Julius Stumpf, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on an- information which charged that he did commit the crime of selling intoxicating liquor. May 23, 1911, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of six months and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. Prom the. judgment the defendant appealed. We have carefully examined the record and find no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stumpf-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.