Stumpf v. Littell
103 A. 1054, 89 N.J. Eq. 213, 4 Stock. 213, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 328
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner-13.
For reversal — ifone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stumpf v. Littell, 103 A. 1054, 89 N.J. Eq. 213, 4 Stock. 213, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 1918).
103 A. 1054 (Stumpf v. Littell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rouse v. Pollard
18 A.2d 5 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)