Stump v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
JULIE RENEE STUMP,
Plaintiff,
v. No. CV 21-413 CG
KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Julie Renee Stump’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Motion”), (Doc. 24), filed June 10, 2022. In the Motion, Ms. Stump indicates the parties have agreed to award her attorney fees in the amount of $6,638 and costs in the amount of $402.00. (Doc. 24 at 1-2). The Court, having reviewed the Motion under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and noting the Motion is unopposed, finds the Motion is well- taken and shall be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Ms. Stump be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,638 and costs in the amount of $402.00 pursuant to EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, made payable to Ms. Stump but mailed to her attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Ms. Stump’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Ms. Stump’s
1 Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 9, 2021. counsel shall refund the smaller award to Ms. Stump pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED. + THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stump v. Social Security Administration (Stump v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.