Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stump v. Butterfield

Stump v. Butterfield

111 A.D. 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs arid disbursements; motion denied with costs, and verdict, reinstated, upon the authority of Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley & Co. (182 N. Y. 482). Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and,Gaynor, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stump v. Butterfield, 111 A.D. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

111 A.D. 916 (Stump v. Butterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dubuc v. . Lazell, Dalley Co.
75 N.E. 401 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)