Stultz v. State

1926 OK CR 369, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 360
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 23, 1926
DocketNo. A-5667.
StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 369 (Stultz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stultz v. State, 1926 OK CR 369, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 360 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Stultz, plaintiff in error, in the county court of Stephens county, was convicted of the offense of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquors, with his punishment fixed by a jury at a fine of $50 and 30 days in jail. The attorneys for plaintiff in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and abate the action, upon a showing made that the plaintiff in error is deceased. Upon consideration of the motion and proofs produced in support thereof, the motion is allowed, the appeal dismissed, and the cause abated, and it is ordered that the obligators on the appeal bond be released and exonerated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK CR 369, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stultz-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.