Stulsaft v. Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co.

262 A.D. 740, 28 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666

This text of 262 A.D. 740 (Stulsaft v. Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stulsaft v. Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co., 262 A.D. 740, 28 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, on the authority of Cochran Box & Mfg. Co., Inc., v. Monroe Binder Board Company (197 App. Div. 221; affd., 232 N. Y. 503). Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; O’Malley and Glennon, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cochran Box & Manufacturing Co. v. Monroe Binder Board Co.
134 N.E. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Cochran Box & Manufacturing Co. v. Monroe Binder Board Co.
197 A.D. 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 740, 28 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stulsaft-v-mercer-tube-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1941.