Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008)

Oregon Tax Court

Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008)

DecidedMay 2, 2008

DocketTC-MD 070834B.

StatusPublished

This text of Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008) (Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008), (Or. Super. Ct. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss (motion), filed November 27, 2007, as part of its Answer, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on January 29, 2008, to discuss Defendant's motion. Shana Rachelle Stull appeared on her own behalf. Leah R. Hinton, tax auditor, appeared for Defendant.

A Notice of Proposed Adjustment and/or Distribution (Notice) was mailed to Plaintiff's address of record on July 20, 2007. It became final 30 days later on August 19, 2007. From that date, Plaintiff had 90 days to bring a timely appeal to this court.

Defendant contends that Plaintiff filed her appeal 92 days after the date of the Notice became final. Plaintiff stated she was occupied with other matters that caused her delay in filing. During the conference, Plaintiff acknowledged that she postmarked her Complaint to the court November 19, 2007, which is more than 90 days after the date the Defendant's Notice became final. See ORS 305.280(2) (2005); McDowell v.Dept. of Rev., TC-MD No 050812C (Nov 28, 2005) (citing ORS 305.280(2) and holding that taxpayer's appeal filed three days after the statutory deadline must be dismissed). *Page 2

Because Plaintiff acknowledges that the Complaint was filed after the statutory deadline, the court grants Defendant's motion. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of May 2008.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on May 2,2008. The Court filed and entered this document on May 2, 2008. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss (motion), filed November 27, 2007, as part of its Answer, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on January 29, 2008, to discuss Defendant's motion. Shana Rachelle Stull appeared on her own behalf. Leah R. Hinton, tax auditor, appeared for Defendant.

A Notice of Proposed Adjustment and/or Distribution (Notice) was mailed to Plaintiff's address of record on July 20, 2007. It became final 30 days later on August 19, 2007. From that date, Plaintiff had 90 days to bring a timely appeal to this court.

Defendant contends that Plaintiff filed her appeal 92 days after the date of the Notice became final. Plaintiff stated she was occupied with other matters that caused her delay in filing. During the conference, Plaintiff acknowledged that she postmarked her Complaint to the court November 19, 2007, which is more than 90 days after the date the Defendant's Notice became final. See ORS 305.280(2) (2005); McDowell v.Dept. of Rev., TC-MD No 050812C (Nov 28, 2005) (citing ORS 305.280(2) and holding that taxpayer's appeal filed three days after the statutory deadline must be dismissed). *Page 2

Because Plaintiff acknowledges that the Complaint was filed after the statutory deadline, the court grants Defendant's motion. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of May 2008.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on May 2,2008. The Court filed and entered this document on May 2, 2008. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Stull v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070834b (or.tax 5-2-2008), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stull-v-department-of-revenue-tc-md-070834b-ortax-5-2-2008-ortc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack