Stukes v. BACHMEYER

249 S.W.3d 470, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 9587, 2007 WL 4285206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stukes v. BACHMEYER. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 S.W.3d 461
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 2007·No. 11-05-00362-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON REMITTITUR

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, Marvin Bachmeyer, Individually and d/b/a Marvin Bachmeyer Road Construction Co., has filed with the clerk of this court a remittitur as suggested in our original opinion dated August 16, 2007. We modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that John C. Stukes and Joan F. Stukes recover judgment against Marvin Bachmeyer for attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,750. Tex.R.App. P. 46.8.

As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stukes v. BACHMEYER, 249 S.W.3d 470, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 9587, 2007 WL 4285206 (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

249 S.W.3d 470 (Stukes v. BACHMEYER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.