Studstill v. ESTATE OF STUDSTILL

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Studstill v. ESTATE OF STUDSTILL

669 S.E.2d 207, 294 Ga. App. 276, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1204

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 28, 2008·No. A08A0924·Published

Opinion

BARNES, Chief Judge.

In this case, the following circumstances exist and are disposi-tive of the appeal:

(1) The evidence supports the judgment;

(2) No reversible error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value; and

(3) The judgment of the court below adequately explains the decision.

The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, E J., concurs. Phipps, J., concurs in judgment only. *277 Decided October 28, 2008. Smith & Cannon, Chester L. Cannon, Jr., for appellant. Ashley W. McLaughlin, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNES, Chief Judge.

In this case, the following circumstances exist and are disposi-tive of the appeal:

(1) The evidence supports the judgment;

(2) No reversible error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value; and

(3) The judgment of the court below adequately explains the decision.

The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, E J., concurs. Phipps, J., concurs in judgment only. *277 Decided October 28, 2008. Smith & Cannon, Chester L. Cannon, Jr., for appellant. Ashley W. McLaughlin, for appellee.

Studstill v. ESTATE OF STUDSTILL, 669 S.E.2d 207, 294 Ga. App. 276, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1204 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

669 S.E.2d 207 (Studstill v. ESTATE OF STUDSTILL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.