Studstill v. American Oil Co.

228 S.E.2d 8, 139 Ga. App. 54, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1676
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 21, 1976
Docket51887
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 S.E.2d 8 (Studstill v. American Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Studstill v. American Oil Co., 228 S.E.2d 8, 139 Ga. App. 54, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1676 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the defendant. Upon the trial of the case, the jury was unable to agree on a verdict, and the trial judge declared a mistrial. The defendant moved for a directed verdict notwithstanding the mistrial. The trial judge granted defendant’s motion. The plaintiff appeals the judgment entered in favor of the defendant.

The evidence shows that the plaintiff was injured in an automobile collision with a truck driven by a Mr. Vaughn. During the trial of the case, the officer who investigated the accident referred to the Vaughn truck as the American Oil truck. This was the only evidence connecting the defendant with the collision which allegedly caused plaintiffs injuries.

The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant on [55]*55the grounds that there was no evidence that the truck was being operated by defendant’s agent or an employee of defendant in the course of his employment. Held:

Argued April 8, 1976 Decided May 21, 1976 Rehearing denied June 15, 1976 Rembert C. Cravey, for appellant. Smith & Harrington, Will Ed Smith, for appellee.

We find that the trial judge properly granted a directed verdict for American Oil Company notwithstanding the mistrial. The police officer’s reference to the vehicle as the American Oil truck is insufficient to authorize inferences of ownership of the truck; or that it was operated by an agent or employee of the defendant in the course of his employment. See Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 135 Ga. App. 890 (219 SE2d 624); Southern R. Co. v. Hullender, 62 Ga. App. 274 (8 SE2d 674); Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, 113 Ga. App. 531 (148 SE2d 921).

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall and McMurray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Dallas Glass Co.
359 S.E.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Harper v. Samples
298 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Hardin v. Norlin Music, Inc.
283 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 S.E.2d 8, 139 Ga. App. 54, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/studstill-v-american-oil-co-gactapp-1976.