Studman v. Brandman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Studman v. Brandman

18 Misc. 2d 242, 192 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3606

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 242 (Studman v. Brandman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Studman v. Brandman, 18 Misc. 2d 242, 192 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and judgment entered thereon should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defendant and motion denied. The affidavits submitted present triable issues of fact as to whether or not the notes in question were executed and delivered upon the condition alleged by the defendant. (Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Corp., 3 N Y 2d 395 and cases cited therein.)

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and judgment entered thereon should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defendant and motion denied. The affidavits submitted present triable issues of fact as to whether or not the notes in question were executed and delivered upon the condition alleged by the defendant. (Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Corp., 3 N Y 2d 395 and cases cited therein.)

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Misc. 2d 242, 192 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/studman-v-brandman-nyappterm-1959.