Studebaker Harness Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co.

183 S.W. 431, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 161
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Studebaker Harness Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 113
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 1916·No. No. 928.·Published

Opinion

HALL, J.

[1, 2] This suit originated in the justice court of Hemphill county; the amount in controversy being $125. Upon appeal to the district court, judgment was .there rendered in favor of appellant against appel-lee in the sum of $50, and costs. Prior to the rendition of the judgment in the district court the Thirty-Fourth Legislature had increased the jurisdiction of the county court of Hemphill county. This act became operative March 22, 1915. Upon the restoration to the county court of its general jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of the district court of the county over the appeal from the justice court terminated. This question has been definitely settled in the case of Turnbow v. J. E. Bryant Co. (Sup.) 181 S. W. 686, and is conclusive of this appeal. In accordance with the practice prescribed by Judge Phillips in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to transfer the case to the county court of Hemphill county. Since the district court had no jurisdiction to determine the controversy, this court acquires no power by reason of the appeal further than to make the order of transfer.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Studebaker Harness Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co., 183 S.W. 431, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 161 (Tex. Ct. App. 1916).

183 S.W. 431 (Studebaker Harness Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turnbow v. J. E. Bryant Co.
181 S.W. 686 (Texas Supreme Court, 1916)