Studebaker Bros. v. Calderwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Studebaker Bros. v. Calderwood

124 A.D. 931, 109 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D. 931 (Studebaker Bros. v. Calderwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Studebaker Bros. v. Calderwood, 124 A.D. 931, 109 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the justice should have found in favor of the plaintiff the fair and true value of the items of the plaintiff’s claim in addition to the two of sixty-one dollars and thirty dollars and fifty cents, which were allowed, and that the so-called counterclaim should have been disallowed. Woodward, Jenks; Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the justice should have found in favor of the plaintiff the fair and true value of the items of the plaintiff’s claim in addition to the two of sixty-one dollars and thirty dollars and fifty cents, which were allowed, and that the so-called counterclaim should have been disallowed. Woodward, Jenks; Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D. 931, 109 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/studebaker-bros-v-calderwood-nyappdiv-1908.