Studdle v. Studdle

267 So. 2d 688, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6185
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1972·No. No. 72-238·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant husband seeks review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which (a) awarded a $5,100.00 special equity to the wife in the marital home, (b) ordered its sale, and (c) failed to award an interest in the Key Largo property. The marriage had lasted for about six years.

We find substantial competent evidence to support the award of the special equity to the wife in their marital home and sufficient requests for relief to support the order of sale of the marital home. Furthermore, according to facts of this case, the chancellor did not err in failing to award the husband an interest in the Key Largo home, which was in the wife’s name, under the authority of the rule stated in Spector v. Ahrenholz, Fla. App.1958, 107 So.2d 34, at 36:

“ . . .a person who makes a conveyance of his property to another for the purpose of hindering or defrauding creditors is without standing in equity and may not maintain a suit to regain such property from the grantee. [Citations omitted.]”

Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Studdle v. Studdle, 267 So. 2d 688, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 688 (Studdle v. Studdle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Della-Giustina v. Della-Giustina
546 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Fainberg v. Fainberg
380 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Walker v. Walker
336 So. 2d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)