Stucky v. Takeno
This text of Stucky v. Takeno (Stucky v. Takeno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-NOV-2018 09:38 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN THE MATTER OF STEPHANIE C. STUCKY, Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant,
v.
DWIGHT TAKENO, HSTA Interim Executive Director, RAY CAMACHO, HSTA Deputy Executive Director, ERIC NAGAMINE, HSTA UniServ Director, DAVID FORREST, HSTA UniServ Director, and HAWAI#I STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Respondents/Respondents-Appellees
and
HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, State of Hawai#i, Respondent/Intervenor-Agency Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIVIL NO. 12-1-0704(2))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Complainant-Applicant Stephanie C. Stucky’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 17, 2018, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 26, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stucky v. Takeno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stucky-v-takeno-haw-2018.