Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Stuckey v. State

Stuckey v. State

97 S.E. 445, 23 Ga. App. 75, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 41
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1918
Docket9770
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 445 (Stuckey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuckey v. State, 97 S.E. 445, 23 Ga. App. 75, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The only question involved was one of fact, which the jury determined. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. No error of law appears in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Fred Kea, for plaintiff in error. S. P. New, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 445, 23 Ga. App. 75, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuckey-v-state-gactapp-1918.