Stuckey v. Stackpole

26 A.3d 484, 611 Pa. 657
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 8, 2011
Docket595 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 A.3d 484 (Stuckey v. Stackpole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuckey v. Stackpole, 26 A.3d 484, 611 Pa. 657 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

KARLA M. STUCKEY, Petitioner
v.
DORIS E. STACKPOLE, JENNIFER E. STACKPOLE, AND SUSAN L. STACKPOLE AND ALEX C. STACKPOLE: (DECEASED), BY AND THROUGH HIS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE(S), IN BOTH (A) HIS INDIVIDUAL, PERSONAL CAPACITY AND (B) HIS CAPACITY AS A: TRUSTEE OF THE J. HALL STACKPOLE TRUST, AND SPENCER MORGAN AND EVANS ROSE, JR., ESQUIRE, AND COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C., AND REV. THOMAS DUGAN, SMITHFIELD TRUST COMPANY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF: ROBERT L. POTTTER, ESQ., E.J. STRASSBURGER, ESQ., AND STRASSBURGER, McKENNA, GUTNICK: & POTTER, P.C., AND "JOHN DOES" 1-100, Respondents.

No. 595 WAL 2010.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

August 8, 2011.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.3d 484, 611 Pa. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuckey-v-stackpole-pa-2011.