Stuckey v. Stackpole
26 A.3d 484, 611 Pa. 657
Opinion
KARLA M. STUCKEY, Petitioner
v.
DORIS E. STACKPOLE, JENNIFER E. STACKPOLE, AND SUSAN L. STACKPOLE AND ALEX C. STACKPOLE: (DECEASED), BY AND THROUGH HIS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE(S), IN BOTH (A) HIS INDIVIDUAL, PERSONAL CAPACITY AND (B) HIS CAPACITY AS A: TRUSTEE OF THE J. HALL STACKPOLE TRUST, AND SPENCER MORGAN AND EVANS ROSE, JR., ESQUIRE, AND COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C., AND REV. THOMAS DUGAN, SMITHFIELD TRUST COMPANY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF: ROBERT L. POTTTER, ESQ., E.J. STRASSBURGER, ESQ., AND STRASSBURGER, McKENNA, GUTNICK: & POTTER, P.C., AND "JOHN DOES" 1-100, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stuckey v. Stackpole, 26 A.3d 484, 611 Pa. 657 (Pa. 2011).
26 A.3d 484 (Stuckey v. Stackpole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for State Route 0095, Section BSR, in the City of Philadelphia ~ Appeal of: PennDOT
131 A.3d 625 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Estate of Marra v. Tax Claim Bureau of Lackawanna County
95 A.3d 951 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)