Stuckey v. Murphy

145 So. 914, 226 Ala. 700
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 22, 1932·No. 4 Div. 665.·Published

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The appeal is from the decree overruling a demurrer to the cross-bill. The demurrer contained the single assignment of a want of equity, and was properly overruled under the following authorities: Johnson v. Smith, 190 Ala. 521, 67 So. 401; Patillo v. Tucker, 216 Ala. 572, 113 So. 1; Hall v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 225 Ala. 455, 143 So. 452; 42 Corpus Juris, 439.

Let the decree be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stuckey v. Murphy, 145 So. 914, 226 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1932).

145 So. 914 (Stuckey v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
143 So. 452 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Pattillo v. Tucker
113 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Johnson v. Smith
67 So. 401 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)