Stuckey v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Stuckey v. Murphy

145 So. 914, 226 Ala. 700

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 22, 1932

Docket4 Div. 665.

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 914 (Stuckey v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stuckey v. Murphy, 145 So. 914, 226 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The appeal is from the decree overruling a demurrer to the cross-bill. The demurrer contained the single assignment of a want of equity, and was properly overruled under the following authorities: Johnson v. Smith, 190 Ala. 521, 67 So. 401; Patillo v. Tucker, 216 Ala. 572, 113 So. 1; Hall v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 225 Ala. 455, 143 So. 452; 42 Corpus Juris, 439.

Let the decree be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARDNER, J.

The appeal is from the decree overruling a demurrer to the cross-bill. The demurrer contained the single assignment of a want of equity, and was properly overruled under the following authorities: Johnson v. Smith, 190 Ala. 521, 67 So. 401; Patillo v. Tucker, 216 Ala. 572, 113 So. 1; Hall v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 225 Ala. 455, 143 So. 452; 42 Corpus Juris, 439.

Let the decree be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 914, 226 Ala. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuckey-v-murphy-ala-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack