Stuckey v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Supreme Court of Florida

Stuckey v. Armour Fertilizer Works

84 So. 176, 79 Fla. 423

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 1, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the decree aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective par[424]*424ties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that tlieie is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the decree aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective par[424]*424ties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that tlieie is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.

Stuckey v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 84 So. 176, 79 Fla. 423 (Fla. 1920).

Pincite

84 So. 176 (Stuckey v. Armour Fertilizer Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.