Stucker v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Stucker v. Duncan

37 Mo. 160

DecidedJanuary 15, 1866

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Mo. 160 (Stucker v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stucker v. Duncan, 37 Mo. 160 (Mo. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Lovelace, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action for trespass upon real estate. The defendant justified upon the ground of an equitable title in the real estate named in the petition. -It is unnecessary to make a statement of this case inasmuch as it involves in every par[165]*165ticular the same issues that were decided in the case of Hill v. Miller, decided by this court at the August term at St. Joseph (36 Mo. 182); and, for the reasons given in that case, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lovelace, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action for trespass upon real estate. The defendant justified upon the ground of an equitable title in the real estate named in the petition. -It is unnecessary to make a statement of this case inasmuch as it involves in every par[165]*165ticular the same issues that were decided in the case of Hill v. Miller, decided by this court at the August term at St. Joseph (36 Mo. 182); and, for the reasons given in that case, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Mo. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stucker-v-duncan-mo-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack