Stubbs v. State

557 So. 2d 230, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1176, 1990 WL 17504
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1990·No. No. 88-2921·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ervin Stubbs appeals from a conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

We reverse and remand for a new trial. There were three errors:

1. The trial court erred in denying appellant’s request for the jury to be instructed on the necessarily lesser included offense of simple assault, State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla.1986) and Lomax v. State, 345 So.2d 719 (Fla.1977).

2. As conceded by the State, the judgment is in error in classifying the offense a second degree felony. It is a third degree felony.

3. As conceded by the State, the judgment improperly imposed court costs when such issue was never addressed by the trial court.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stubbs v. State, 557 So. 2d 230, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1176, 1990 WL 17504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 230 (Stubbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wimberly
498 So. 2d 929 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Lomax v. State
345 So. 2d 719 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)