Stubbs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Stubbs v. State

896 S.W.2d 430, 320 Ark. 162, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 199

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 27, 1995

DocketCR 95-240

StatusPublished

This text of 896 S.W.2d 430 (Stubbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stubbs v. State, 896 S.W.2d 430, 320 Ark. 162, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 199 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Robert Stubbs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bill Luppen, admits that the record was prematurely and untimely filed due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Robert Stubbs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bill Luppen, admits that the record was prematurely and untimely filed due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 S.W.2d 430, 320 Ark. 162, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubbs-v-state-ark-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack