Stubbs v. Lantz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Stubbs v. Lantz

61 N.W. 967, 94 Iowa 731

DecidedJanuary 19, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.W. 967 (Stubbs v. Lantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stubbs v. Lantz, 61 N.W. 967, 94 Iowa 731 (iowa 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Given, O. J.

I. Appellant’s dhly contention is that the judgment is not warranted -by the evidence.

It will serve no good purpose to set out, or discuss, the evidence. It is largely of the kind usually found in such cases, -and if true,, discloses a remarkable ignorance on the part of some of the witnesses, as to what they drink, and an unusual fondness for “slop,” and “spoiled water.”

Notwithstanding the evident evasions and prevarications of some of the witnesses, we think the judgment is fully supported by the evidence. — Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Given, O. J.

I. Appellant’s dhly contention is that the judgment is not warranted -by the evidence.

It will serve no good purpose to set out, or discuss, the evidence. It is largely of the kind usually found in such cases, -and if true,, discloses a remarkable ignorance on the part of some of the witnesses, as to what they drink, and an unusual fondness for “slop,” and “spoiled water.”

Notwithstanding the evident evasions and prevarications of some of the witnesses, we think the judgment is fully supported by the evidence. — Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.W. 967, 94 Iowa 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubbs-v-lantz-iowa-1895.