Stubbs v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.

159 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 336, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stubbs v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 N.C. 807
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 16, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbis is an action for personal injury resulting in tbe death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The defendant Ebner is a resident of Washington County, North Carolina, and the Chicago Mill and Lumber Corporation is a corporation created and organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The amount in controversy exceeds $3,000 exclusive of interest and costs.

The corporate defendant filed a petition for the removal of the cause to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, specifically and fully setting out the grounds of the motion: not only diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder of parties, but the pending of substantially the same causé of action in the District Court. Stubbs v. Chicago Mill and Lumber Corporation et al., 199 N. C., 807. The statements contained in the petition must for the purpose of the motion be taken as true, the plaintiff having the right to answer, join issue with the petition or move to remand from the District Court to the State Court. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co., 257 U. S., 92, 66 L. Ed., 144.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stubbs v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp., 159 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 336, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 233 (N.C. 1931).

159 S.E. 926 (Stubbs v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
257 U.S. 92 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Stubbs v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.
154 S.E. 918 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)