Stubbmann v. City of New York

176 A.D. 937
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 A.D. 937 (Stubbmann v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stubbmann v. City of New York, 176 A.D. 937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

— On reargument [See 176 App. Div. 895] judgment dismissing complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it was a question for the jury whether the corporation counsel unreasonably refused to hold the examination at plaintiff’s house and whether thereby the comptroller of the city of Mew York “refused and neglected to make an adjustment or payment’’ of plaintiff’s claim as averred in the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel J. Rice, Inc. v. City of New York
180 Misc. 860 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubbmann-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1917.