Stubbmann v. City of New York
Opinion
— On reargument [See 176 App. Div. 895] judgment dismissing complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it was a question for the jury whether the corporation counsel unreasonably refused to hold the examination at plaintiff’s house and whether thereby the comptroller of the city of Mew York “refused and neglected to make an adjustment or payment’’ of plaintiff’s claim as averred in the complaint.
See Greater M. Y. Charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), § 261, as amd. by Laws of 1912, chap. 452. — [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
176 A.D. 937 (Stubbmann v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.