Stubbmann v. City of New York

176 A.D. 937
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— On reargument [See 176 App. Div. 895] judgment dismissing complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it was a question for the jury whether the corporation counsel unreasonably refused to hold the examination at plaintiff’s house and whether thereby the comptroller of the city of Mew York “refused and neglected to make an adjustment or payment’’ of plaintiff’s claim as averred in the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stubbmann v. City of New York, 176 A.D. 937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

176 A.D. 937 (Stubbmann v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel J. Rice, Inc. v. City of New York
180 Misc. 860 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)