Stubblefield v. Wilson

102 So. 885, 88 Fla. 323
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 So. 885 (Stubblefield v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stubblefield v. Wilson, 102 So. 885, 88 Fla. 323 (Fla. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Browne are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice West and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the judgment should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, and Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys 61 Fla. 389, 54 South, Rep. 452.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment to which the Writ of Error herein was taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dale v. Jennings
107 So. 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 So. 885, 88 Fla. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubblefield-v-wilson-fla-1924.