Stubblefield v. State
This text of 241 S.W. 148 (Stubblefield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The conviction is for misdemeanor theft. The appellant and one, Lindsey, were, by separate complaint and information, charged with the theft of two turkeys from one Herman.
The appellant, in due form and proper time, filed a motion for a severance and that Lindsey be tried first. It appears from the bill that Lindsey was present and ready for trial; that no opposition was urged by him against the order of trial suggested in the motion. The statutes accord the right of severance and prescribe the procedure therefor. See Articles 791 and 727, Code of Crim. Proc., and Art. 91 of the Penal Code. The appellant, in the instant case, having complied with the statutes, the court was not warranted in refusing this demand. This is conceded by the State through the Assistant Attorney General. The precedents are found in Branch’s Ann. Tex. Penal Code, pp. 375 and 376. See also Ligon v. State, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 147, 198 S. W. Rep., 787.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 S.W. 148, 92 Tex. Crim. 53, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubblefield-v-state-texcrimapp-1922.