Stubblefield v. State

497 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 2016 WL 4525452
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 30, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103275
StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.3d 358 (Stubblefield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stubblefield v. State, 497 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 2016 WL 4525452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stubblefield appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the [359]*359record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mp. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 2016 WL 4525452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubblefield-v-state-moctapp-2016.