Stubblefield v. State

497 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 2016 WL 4525452
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2016·No. No. ED 103275·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stubblefield appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the [359] record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mp. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stubblefield v. State, 497 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 2016 WL 4525452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

497 S.W.3d 358 (Stubblefield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.