Stubblefield v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stubblefield v. Dade County

137 So. 2d 607

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1962

DocketNo. 61-399

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 So. 2d 607 (Stubblefield v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stubblefield v. Dade County, 137 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgment in condemnation, was taken by owners to whom a jury awarded $675 for the taking of a ten foot strip for street widening. The portion taken was a walkway, and the area between the walk and the street which would be added to the street. The walk would remain, as a public walk. We have examined [608]*608the record and given consideration to the several questions briefed and urged by appellants as a basis for reversal, and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgment in condemnation, was taken by owners to whom a jury awarded $675 for the taking of a ten foot strip for street widening. The portion taken was a walkway, and the area between the walk and the street which would be added to the street. The walk would remain, as a public walk. We have examined [608]*608the record and given consideration to the several questions briefed and urged by appellants as a basis for reversal, and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 2d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stubblefield-v-dade-county-fladistctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack