Stubblefield v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stubblefield v. City of St. Louis

489 S.W.3d 820, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 485, 2015 WL 2090144

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 5, 2015·No. No. ED 101907·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eugene Stubblefield (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission (“the Commission”) to uphold Appellant’s termination from his position as Commissioner of the Division of Corrections by the St. Louis Department of Public Safety. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[821] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eugene Stubblefield (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission (“the Commission”) to uphold Appellant’s termination from his position as Commissioner of the Division of Corrections by the St. Louis Department of Public Safety. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[821] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Stubblefield v. City of St. Louis, 489 S.W.3d 820, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 485, 2015 WL 2090144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 820 (Stubblefield v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.