Stuart v. Stuart
This text of 149 A.D.2d 499 (Stuart v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Galfunt, J.H.O.), dated July 28, 1987, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination insofar as it directed the defendant to pay for the counsel fees incurred by both parties.
Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision which, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination insofar as it directed the defendant wife to pay for the counsel fees incurred by both parties and substituting therefor a provision directing each party to pay for his and her own counsel fees; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We find that the Supreme Court should not have required the wife to pay for the husband’s counsel fees out of funds [500]*500which are the subject of a pending plenary action. Instead, we conclude that each party should pay for his or her own counsel fees in view of their respective financial circumstances (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 A.D.2d 499, 540 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-stuart-nyappdiv-1989.