Stuart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Stuart v. State

181 S.W.2d 278

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 21, 1944

DocketNo. 22913

StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.W.2d 278 (Stuart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stuart v. State, 181 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of ■embezzlement and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of ■embezzlement and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.W.2d 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-state-texcrimapp-1944.