Stuart v. State
389 So. 2d 4, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stuart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17180 →
Opinion
The appellant’s judgment of conviction is reversed with directions to discharge him from custody. Because of the reasons and authorities stated in Royer v. State, 389 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980( (en banc) and State v. Frost, 374 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we find the trial court erroneously denied appellant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence.
Reversed with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stuart v. State, 389 So. 2d 4, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
389 So. 2d 4 (Stuart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Frost
374 So. 2d 593 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Royer v. State
389 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)