Stuart v. Springs Industries, Inc.

572 F. App'x 191
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2014
DocketNo. 13-1984
StatusPublished

This text of 572 F. App'x 191 (Stuart v. Springs Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart v. Springs Industries, Inc., 572 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rhett Gavin Stuart appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Springs Industries, Inc., in his action alleging that Springs negligently failed to warn of a dangerous condition, resulting in his injuries. We have reviewed the record and briefs filed [192]*192by the parties, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. Springs, Indus., 957 F.Supp.2d 644 (D.S.C.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stuart v. Springs Industries, Inc.
957 F. Supp. 2d 644 (D. South Carolina, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 F. App'x 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-springs-industries-inc-ca4-2014.