Stuart v. Pinto

Third Circuit

Stuart v. Pinto

419 F.2d 126

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1969

DocketNo. 17799

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 126 (Stuart v. Pinto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stuart v. Pinto, 419 F.2d 126 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an action under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.) brought by appellant against the Superintendent of the New Jersey State Prison at Rahway, New Jersey. The district court, in an opinion presently unreported, dismissed the action.

The complaint in substance deals with certain prison regulations and conduct by prison officials in general terms inadequate to establish a right to relief.

We therefore will affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an action under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.) brought by appellant against the Superintendent of the New Jersey State Prison at Rahway, New Jersey. The district court, in an opinion presently unreported, dismissed the action.

The complaint in substance deals with certain prison regulations and conduct by prison officials in general terms inadequate to establish a right to relief.

We therefore will affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-pinto-ca3-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack