Stuart v. Patterson
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Held, that the offer made by the defendants to prove by the witness Bowman certain declarations of John M. Stuart, was erroneously excluded. (69 N. Y., 104; 22 Hun, 389.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stuart v. Patterson, 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 (Stuart v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Filkins v. . People
69 N.Y. 101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)