Stuart v. Patterson

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 (Stuart v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart v. Patterson, 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Held, that the offer made by the defendants to prove by the witness Bowman certain declarations of John M. Stuart, was erroneously excluded. (69 N. Y., 104; 22 Hun, 389.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Filkins v. . People
69 N.Y. 101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-patterson-nysupct-1881.