Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n

405 F. App'x 794

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2010·No. No. 10-1446·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Stuart appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. LaSalle Bank Lending Ass’n, No. 3:09-cv-00459-JRS, 2010 WL 582162 (E.D. Va. Feb 11 2010) & (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Stuart appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. LaSalle Bank Lending Ass’n, No. 3:09-cv-00459-JRS, 2010 WL 582162 (E.D. Va. Feb 11 2010) & (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n, 405 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

405 F. App'x 794 (Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.