Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n

405 F. App'x 794
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1446
StatusPublished

This text of 405 F. App'x 794 (Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n, 405 F. App'x 794 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Stuart appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. LaSalle Bank Lending Ass’n, No. 3:09-cv-00459-JRS, 2010 WL 582162 (E.D. Va. Feb 11 2010) & (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 F. App'x 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-lasalle-bank-national-assn-ca4-2010.