Stuart v. Arthur Construction Co.

104 S.E.2d 233, 97 Ga. App. 657
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 22, 1958
Docket37135
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E.2d 233 (Stuart v. Arthur Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart v. Arthur Construction Co., 104 S.E.2d 233, 97 Ga. App. 657 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

This case arose in the Civil Court of Fulton County wherein William 0. Stuart and Gloria Stuart brought a money action against Arthur Construction Company and Arthur Whitehill. The defendants filed answers and cross-actions to which the plaintiffs demurred. The trial court overruled the demurrers and it is on this judgment that the case is here for review.

Where, as here, there is no final judgment excepted to in the bill of exceptions, the writ of error must be dismissed by this court. See Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Terrell, 155 Ga. 374 (116 S. E. 793), and American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Bank of Madison, 34 Ga. App. 62 (128 S. E. 208).

Writ of error dismissed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Terrell
116 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Bank of Madison
128 S.E. 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E.2d 233, 97 Ga. App. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-arthur-construction-co-gactapp-1958.