Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp.

493 So. 2d 1136, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1986
Docket85-2237
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 1136 (Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp., 493 So. 2d 1136, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

493 So.2d 1136 (1986)

STUART PLAZA, LTD., Appellant,
v.
ATLANTIC COAST DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF MARTIN COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 85-2237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 17, 1986.

Brian B. Joslyn of DeSantis, Cook, Gaskill & Silverman, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Wesley R. Harvin of Harvin, Frasier, Geary & Mannikko, Stuart, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellee, a tenant in property owned by appellant, sued appellant for damages and specific performance arising out of appellant's alleged unreasonable refusal to consent to appellee's assignment of the lease. On the day of trial appellee voluntarily dismissed its case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 1.420(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellant thereafter moved the court to tax attorney's fees and costs on the grounds that the lease between the parties provided for the recovery of attorney's fees by the prevailing party in any litigation arising out of the lease contract. The trial court awarded appellant its costs but denied an award of attorney's fees because it perceived that Rule 1.420(d) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, did not include attorney's fees in an award of costs.

On appeal appellee seems to contend that the trial court was correct because the only fees which may be taxed pursuant to the rule in question upon a voluntary dismissal are fees provided for by statute. We hold this to be an incorrect understanding of the current status of the law on this question.

*1137 Initially, we point out that when a plaintiff takes a voluntary dismissal the defendant is the prevailing party. Gordon v. Warren Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 340 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); McKelvey v. Kismet, Inc., 430 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Dolphin Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Del Bene, 388 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Next, we hold that after a voluntary dismissal by plaintiff the trial court does have jurisdiction to award attorney's fees where the fees are authorized by statute or a contract between the parties. Hatch v. Dance, 464 So.2d 713 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Reineke v. McKinstry, 445 So.2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Giachetti v. Johnson, 308 So.2d 143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to determine reasonable attorney's fees to be awarded to appellant.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nestor v. VPC3 II, LLP
M.D. Florida, 2025
Calatlantic Grp., Inc. v. Dau
268 So. 3d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Yampol v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
186 So. 3d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Valcarcel v. CHASE BANK USA NA
54 So. 3d 989 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. v. Ferrer
990 So. 2d 13 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Alhambra Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Asad
943 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Murillo v. Tri-State Employment Services, Inc.
925 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Prescott v. Anthony
803 So. 2d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Chambers
732 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Sopena v. Rowland Coffee Roasters, Inc.
716 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Oakwood Plaza, LP v. DOC OPTICS
708 So. 2d 959 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Garcell v. Holder
689 So. 2d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Boca Airport, Inc. v. Roll-N-Roaster of Boca, Inc.
690 So. 2d 640 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Griffin v. Berkley South Condominium Ass'n
661 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Stout Jewelers, Inc. v. Corson
639 So. 2d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Rose Printing Co., Inc. v. Wilson
602 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
BARRY A. COHEN, PA v. LaTorre
595 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 So. 2d 1136, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-plaza-ltd-v-atlantic-coast-development-corp-fladistctapp-1986.