Stuart Plastering Co. v. Asbury

203 So. 2d 163, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3429
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1967
DocketNo. 36649
StatusPublished

This text of 203 So. 2d 163 (Stuart Plastering Co. v. Asbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart Plastering Co. v. Asbury, 203 So. 2d 163, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3429 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1967.

[164]*164We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 163, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-plastering-co-v-asbury-fla-1967.