Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo

272 S.W.3d 473, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1687

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 9, 2008

DocketED 90068

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 S.W.3d 473 (Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo, 272 S.W.3d 473, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in plaintiffs favor in plaintiffs lawsuit to recover an amount owing for services rendered. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI