Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections

Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections

944 A.2d 751
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2008·No. 23 EAP 2007·Published

Opinion

944 A.2d 751 (2008)

Paul SATTERFIELD, and All other Inmates Similarly Situated within the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, now and in the Future, Appellants
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D.; Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; William S. Stickman, Deputy Secretary For Western Region; Michael A. Faman, Chief Counsel; Timothy I. Mark, Deputy Chief Counsel; Robert S. Bitner, Chief Hearing Examiner; Harry E. Wilson, Superintendent of SCI-Fayette; Kerri Cross, Hearing Examiner; Carl E. Walker, Program Review Committee; Bradley Newton, Program *752 Review Committee; Robert Stafford, Program Review Committee; Debra Mahimeister, Corrections Classification And Program Manager; Michael Howard, Inmate Employment Officer, Appellees.

No. 23 EAP 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 12, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the above-captioned appeal is herewith quashed for failure to file a brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections, 944 A.2d 751 (Pa. 2008).

944 A.2d 751 (Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.