Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections

944 A.2d 751

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 12, 2008

Docket23 EAP 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 944 A.2d 751 (Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stterfield v. Pa Dept. of Corrections, 944 A.2d 751 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

944 A.2d 751 (2008)

Paul SATTERFIELD, and All other Inmates Similarly Situated within the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, now and in the Future, Appellants
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D.; Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; William S. Stickman, Deputy Secretary For Western Region; Michael A. Faman, Chief Counsel; Timothy I. Mark, Deputy Chief Counsel; Robert S. Bitner, Chief Hearing Examiner; Harry E. Wilson, Superintendent of SCI-Fayette; Kerri Cross, Hearing Examiner; Carl E. Walker, Program Review Committee; Bradley Newton, Program *752 Review Committee; Robert Stafford, Program Review Committee; Debra Mahimeister, Corrections Classification And Program Manager; Michael Howard, Inmate Employment Officer, Appellees.

No. 23 EAP 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 12, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the above-captioned appeal is herewith quashed for failure to file a brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI