Strysick v. Strysick
673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5115, 1996 WL 252871
Opinion
Under the circumstances of this case, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to fail to award at least a nominal amount of permanent alimony to preserve the future right of the wife to such assistance. See McClay v. McClay, 447 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). To that extent, we reverse and remand. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strysick v. Strysick, 673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5115, 1996 WL 252871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 190 (Strysick v. Strysick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McClay v. McClay
447 So. 2d 1026 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)