Strysick v. Strysick
673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5115, 1996 WL 252871
This text of 673 So. 2d 190 (Strysick v. Strysick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Strysick v. Strysick, 673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5115, 1996 WL 252871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Under the circumstances of this case, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to fail to award at least a nominal amount of permanent alimony to preserve the future right of the wife to such assistance. See McClay v. McClay, 447 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). To that extent, we reverse and remand. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McClay v. McClay
447 So. 2d 1026 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 190, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5115, 1996 WL 252871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strysick-v-strysick-fladistctapp-1996.