Stryker v. SAIF

456 P.3d 381, 301 Or. App. 761
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
DocketA159793
StatusPublished

This text of 456 P.3d 381 (Stryker v. SAIF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stryker v. SAIF, 456 P.3d 381, 301 Or. App. 761 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, November 20, 2019, reversed and remanded January 15, 2020

In the Matter of the Compensation of Claudia S. Stryker, Claimant. Claudia S. STRYKER, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and HWC Clients, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1402859; A159793 456 P3d 381

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Stryker v. SAIF Corporation, 365 Or 657, 451 P3d 1015 (2019). Julene M. Quinn filed the briefs for petitioner. David L. Runner filed the brief for respondents. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. Caren v. Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or 466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)
446 P.3d 67 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 P.3d 381, 301 Or. App. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stryker-v-saif-orctapp-2020.